Should Christians seek protection in court?
So, we are perfectly familiar with the Gospel episode, which features the trial of Christ. In this episode, I remind you, one of the Jews present struck Christ. And now, instead of putting his cheek under another blow, Christ rebuked the offender: "If I am at fault, then tell me what it is?" And if not – why are you beating me?"
In another place in the Scriptures, namely, in the Book of Acts, we can read about how holy apostle Paul used his civil rights and demanded the judgment with Caesar. Many saints, such as Ignatius the God-bearer, for the time being, avoided persecutions and did not seek them. But when their time came, they courageously accepted death and reproaches for Christ.
From these and many other episodes, we can more than clearly see that Christians have the full right to defend their civil rights before the civil society. We live in a state, pay taxes, enforce laws and have the right to rely on certain obligations the state takes on in relation to us as citizens and members of society. At the same time, we clearly separate the protection of our own rights and dignity from the protection of the Church. That is, if they hurt me personally – I can and must forgive them. But if it comes to the Church, and, moreover, to protecting Her honor, then I can and must defend the Church.
Metropolitan Filaret (Drozdov) once said: "Fight enemies of your state. Scorn enemies of your Church. Forgive your personal enemies."Basically, these words can be used by us, modern Christians, as a guideline to action. However, one must always bear in mind that the final word, in any case, rests and always will with God – He is the Judge of both the living and the dead.
Read also
Naughty Orthobros and Nice Ecumenists
Why are traditional "Orthobros" perpetually branded as naughty, while their progressive and ecumenist critics get a free pass to the nice list—no matter how harshly they condemn their brethren?
The Uniate's Dilemma
A Uniate priest praises Catholicism’s supposed “unity in diversity” as proven by the Eastern Catholic churches. Yet Rome itself has formally repudiated Uniatism as a violent, politically-driven mistake that deepened the schism and can no longer serve as a model—leaving Catholic claims of universality without historical or institutional backing.
The Rush to Embrace
The Iznik “reunion” prayer event was more of a staged media spectacle than historic breakthrough. Pretending ancient dogmatic differences (Filioque, Chalcedon, etc.) are mere semantics undermines the binding authority of Ecumenical Councils and turns the Church into High-Church Protestantism. True unity must be built slowly on agreement in faith, not rushed by abandoning the Councils, saints, and martyrs who defined it—or we open Pandora’s box of relativism.
Elpidophoros vs. the Archons
Rumors of civil war in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese erupted when influential Archons led by Fr. Alexander Karloutsos issued a bizarre statement accusing a pan-Orthodox delegation of Russian espionage and inverting Ukrainian church persecutions — apparently without Abp. Elpidophoros's approval. This speaks to a deeper problem within GOARCH: the unchecked power of its donors over the clergy.
Rep. Joe Wilson Declares War on the Orthodox Church
Rep. Joe Wilson smeared American Orthodox Christians as Russian spies for lobbying against Ukraine’s brutal persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church. If defending persecuted believers is espionage, America’s First Amendment is the real enemy.