Greek Archbishop: Orthodoxy and Hellenism are United

It's an amazing example of the double-speak which has become all too common for the Phanar.

On the one hand, Abp. Makarios attacks hierarchs of the Russian Church simply for speaking of the East Slavic peoples baptized by St. Vladimir of Kiev as a broader "Russian" civilization.

On the other hand, he speaks of Orthodoxy and Hellenism not as similar or tied to one another, but as "two wings of the same body... united and inseparable."

The first is merely an ethno-historical reality, a statement of fact; the second is a dangerous conflation of faith and ethnicity or culture. 

One has to wonder how the Phanar and its clergy can claim to be so opposed to ethnophyletism when they continuously preach it from the amvon.

But the double-speak does not end there. 

On February 16, 2025, the Orthodox Times reported:

On global Orthodox affairs, [Archbishop Makarios] condemned the Russian Church’s expansionist policies... He reaffirmed that no war is justified in Orthodox theology, criticizing the involvement of religious leaders in conflicts.

 

And yet, in the hierarch's homily on Annunciation, he praises the Greek War of Independence, saying that God was with them:

 

They knew they were outnumbered and lacked military resources, yet their hearts were seized by the desire for freedom. It was this longing for liberty, along with their unwavering faith that “with God nothing will be impossible,” that led to the achievement of the independence of our homeland.

 

If there can never be a theological justification for war, how can one justify the Greek Church and its hierarchs celebrating the Greek War of Independence - much less their support during the conflict?

If the involvement of religious leaders in war is a cause for criticism, why does Abp. Makarios not condemn Metropolitan Germanos III of Old Patros, who called for revolution and blessed the revolutionary flag?

Should he not denounce Pat. Bartholomew for involving himself in the Ukraine conflict?

Clearly, the archbishops' statements are politically motivated. The Church has clear cut teachings on war and the duties of a Christian towards their nation which are rooted in Scripture itself [Jn. 15:13] and the lives and teachings of the saints.

Unfortunately, it is not only Abp. Makarios who makes such statements. As we have repeatedly pointed out, Constantinopolitan hierarchs regularly conflate Hellenism with Orthodoxy.

Can they not be said then to espouse an ideology of the Greek World? Can we not speak of Constantinople as promulgating an ethnophilic Grecheskiy mir heresy?

Perhaps. But this would all imply sincerity on the part of the Phanar, that their statements against the Russian Church's ecclesiology are based on actual theological differences - they are not.

Instead, these are political attacks. They have been launched with the hope of securing and maintaining the support of the West - the same mistake Constantinople made in the dying days of Byzantium.

Our Greek brothers have forgotten the words which the Holy Spirit spoke through the Prophet and King David: "Put not your trust in princes and the sons of men in whom there is no salvation." 

Read also

The Kremlin's Archons

After accusing a pan-Orthodox delegation of being “lobbyists for Putin,” it turns out two of the Archons’ own have actually lobbied on behalf of Russian interests.

A Miscarriage of Justice: How the Phanar Betrayed Met. Tychikos

The following article by Fr. Anastasios Gotsopoulos was first published by the UOJ's Greek bureau. It has been edited for an American audience.

The New McCarthyism

Today, a delegation of Orthodox clergy will meet with the White House to plead on behalf of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). Yet mainstream media outlets like The Hill and politicians like Rep. Joe Wilson are dismissing the effort as a Kremlin psyop. This is offensive to the UOC, and to Orthodox Christians here in the United States.

Zelensky-Style Sanctions: The 'Mindich Case' vs. the 'UOJ Case'

Ten years of sanctions for journalists who criticize the authorities, and three years for corrupt officials who steal millions. A story about whom and how people are punished in modern Ukraine.

Will the Phanar Abandon the OCU?

The Orthodox Times ' plea for a “temporary Exarchate” in Ukraine under Constantinople admits the 2019 Tomos birthed division, not unity. Amid OCU defections, state seizures, and Phanar whispers of a puppet church, the proposal is a white flag for a failed intervention. Of course, it also vindicates Met. Onuphry’s steadfast flock.

The Papacy Is Not a 'Development'—It's a Contradiction

The Holy Canons assert the absolute authority of each bishop within his own diocese. The Ecumenical Councils, while acknowledging the Pope's symbolic primacy, also explicitly checked his attempts to exercise superior authority over the Church, or to place himself above his fellow bishops. And the Church Fathers fleshed out this ecclesiology, affirming the rights of bishops and synods while checking papal ambitions.