Primitivism and Chauvinism Are Still Alive, Well, and Dangerous in the Balkans

The Archbishop of Genocide and that which he blessed: according to the data of several sources (e.g. The International Commission for the Truth about Jasenovac), as many as 1400 Catholic priests, friars and nuns directly participated in the bloodiest murd

Originally Posted by UOJ-Serbia

On the front page of the Hrvatski Tjednik issue dated April 24, 2025, there is an image of Pope Francis from behind, walking away. It is captioned:
"Farewell to the Pope, he is not worth a single Croatian tear because he loved the criminal Serbian Orthodox Church more than Croatian Catholics and Stepinac."

This is how the editorial board of this so-called “only true Croatian weekly,” as it is described by editor Ivica Marijačić on his Facebook profile, decided to bid farewell to the head of the Roman Catholic Church, who passed away on April 21, 2025.

Of course, Pope Francis is being accused of persistently refusing to authorize the final, fourth step of the canonization of Alojzije Stepinac, who currently holds the status of “blessed.”

Stepinac, alongside prominent Ustaša “activists” and mass murderers, stood shoulder to shoulder as a war criminal during the Independent State of Croatia (NDH). He was responsible—as he boasted to the Pope—for the forced conversion of over 240,000 Serbs, concluding that through his efforts between the wars, especially by directing the work of the “Catholic Action,” he had prepared “the harvest of the Serbian national field” (source: Stepinac and the Catholic Action by Dr. Nikola Žutić, the foremost authority on uncovering the identity of Catholic Serbs in Croatia).

This, of course, was not his only action during the NDH. The “converted” Serbs (they were not “rebaptized”—because Catholics did not see Orthodox believers as Christians but as apostates) were not saved from what historical science has given a special name—“Serbicide.”

Stepinac took part in—organized, encouraged, and justified—mass murders and, overall, blessed Catholic clergy who directly participated in them. All these names and facts are well documented.

In his pro-Ustaša Hrvatski Tjednik and on Facebook, Marijačić calls criminals victims and victims criminals. A classic inversion of truth, wrapped in fake “morality”—something anyone can verify with a simple internet search.

It seems Mr. Marijačić himself is not lacking in personal (in)actions, though admittedly, due to circumstances, they pale in comparison to the crimes of those he considers national heroes.

We will limit ourselves to mentioning just one court ruling related to his “professional achievements” in recent years.

In a similar manner to how he characterized WWII victims and criminals, he violated the legally protected privacy of a 15-year-old girl who was the victim of gang rape and abuse in Croatia. He even went so far as to claim that the crime never happened.

He was sentenced to prison for this. The sentence was later converted to a suspended sentence, but that in no way lessens the vileness of his act.

And this is not the only questionable instance from this supporter of Stepinac’s “holiness.”

The upper section of the same front page adds another provocation:
“Jasenovac and Stara Gradiška, these are the homes of Tito’s butchers!”

According to Politika, the article also mentions Jazovka, Huda Jama, Tezno, and 1,600 other WWII execution sites, claiming they were the work of “Tito’s butchers.”

This may be news to “Mr.” Marijačić, but the communists indeed took control of numerous Nazi and collaborator crime sites at the end of the war. Taking over control of bloody Nazi—and particularly Ustaša—execution grounds, whether they were camps, pits, or mass graves, they sometimes released people, but more often imprisoned them. In Belgrade alone, there were several such camps. Staro Sajmište and Jajinci are the most well-known.

Since we can confidently assume he does not (wish to) know this—because it does not fit the narrative he spins “like a broken record” on his Facebook profile—it may be worth pointing out for those who have ears to hear.

Among the first, most numerous, and most ruthlessly tortured and killed victims of the communists were precisely the clergy, monks, and believers of the Serbian Orthodox Church. Without any trial, they were subjected to the most horrific tortures, mutilations, and killings both in and outside those camps.

The Museum of Genocide Victims in Belgrade is an excellent (and not the only) source for all those with the intellectual courage to learn the truth.

But even that, it seems, is “too far a shot” for what “Mr.” Marijačić promotes to his readers, who are neither intellectually brave nor capable of understanding such complexity—just like the many pseudo-intellectuals of pro-Ustaša orientation who came before him.

 

 

Read also

The Papacy Is Not a 'Development'—It's a Contradiction

The Holy Canons assert the absolute authority of each bishop within his own diocese. The Ecumenical Councils, while acknowledging the Pope's symbolic primacy, also explicitly checked his attempts to exercise superior authority over the Church, or to place himself above his fellow bishops. And the Church Fathers fleshed out this ecclesiology, affirming the rights of bishops and synods while checking papal ambitions.

Meet the New Rome, Same as the Old Rome

J.D. Vance’s comparison of the Ecumenical Patriarch to the Pope highlights growing tensions within Orthodoxy, as critics accuse Patriarch Bartholomew of pursuing "Greek papism" and aligning with U.S. geopolitical interests, risking the erosion of his primacy of love and the unity of the Orthodox Church.

The Trial of Met. Tychikos: When the Church ‘Washes Her Hands’

A look at the clear parallels between Pilate’s trial and the trial of Met. Tychikos.

From Protestant Pastor to Orthodox Priest

Joshua Genig was the son of devout Lutherans. From an early age, he dreamed of serving the Lutheran church as a pastor and teacher. He got his wish—and yet one thought kept him up at night: "Is any of this real?" After years of searching, Genig and his family were received into the Orthodox Church, and the Rev. Mr. Genig is now Father Joshua.

Analysis: The ‘Appeal’ of Metropolitan Tikhikos and the Patriarchal Synod

The Synod of the Church of Constantinople is going to review the high-profile appeal of Metropolitan Tychikos, who was removed from the Paphos See by the Cypriot Synod. What decision will the Synod members of Constantinople make?

The Abp. of Cyprus, the Euros, and the Phanar

What explains the certainty of the Archbishop of Cyprus that the Patriarchate will validate his own and the Synod’s illegal actions in the case of Tychikos? Does he know the decision long before the Synod convenes?