UOC Legal Dept: No bans for us in law on chaplaincy but surprises possible

Протоиерей Александр Бахов. Фото: foma.in.ua

The chaplaincy law does not contain direct prohibitions for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, but there may be surprises during its implementation, said the head of the Legal Department of the UOC Archpriest Alexander Bakhov in a comment to the UOJ.

He explained that with the exclusion of Part 3 of Art. 7 from the text of the draft law, “there are no direct or indirect prohibitions or restrictions on chaplaincy service for priests of the UOC in it”.

However, the head of the Legal Department emphasized, at the stage of implementation of this law "there may be surprises".

According to him, the adopted law is not perfect, but better than its previous version, which the people's deputies proposed in 2018.

In an official clarification published on the website of the Legal Department of the UOC, the archpriest clarified: at the meeting on November 30, 2021, the deputies did not vote for the amendment with a discriminatory norm in relation to the believers of the UOC, performing military duties in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

So, Part 3 of Article 7 said that “a person who is legally restricted access to associations, military units and subdivisions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Guard of Ukraine, other military formations formed in accordance with the laws of Ukraine and the State Border Service of Ukraine cannot be a military chaplain".

The editing was based on the so-called law on the forced renaming of the Church (No. 2662). Clause 5 of this law states that “it is not allowed to grant advantages or impose restrictions on the activities of a religious organization (association), which is part of the structure (is part of) a religious organization (association), the governing centre (administration) of which is located outside Ukraine in the state, which is recognized by law as such that it carried out military aggression against Ukraine and / or temporarily occupied part of the territory of Ukraine <...> except for restricting the access of priests, religious preachers, mentors of such a religious organization to military units and groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations of Ukraine in places of their dislocation or other restrictions provided by law”.

The deputies did not support this amendment to the draft law on military chaplaincy.

As reported, on November 30, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada adopted in the second reading the bill "On the service of military chaplaincy", removing from the text the mention of the law on the aggressor country. Previous versions of the bill were of a pronounced confessional-biased and discriminatory nature, in fact, prohibiting the priests of the UOC to be military chaplains.

Read also

Catholic Host of 'Roots of Orthodoxy' Says Orthodox Apologists are 'Disgusting', 'Trash'

"You Orthodox apologists are absolutely freaking disgusting," Cabada said. "You're a disgusting human being. You're trash. I'm not scared to say that."

Rep. Bacon: 'I Don't Think the UOC Takes Orders from Russia'

Earlier this week, the congressman rejected an opportunity for dialogue with members of the Society of St. John who visited his office despite them holding the same viewpoint.

Petition Warns Canada’s Hate Speech Law Could Criminalize Scripture

Thousands of Canadians have signed a petition urging the Liberal government to drop proposed hate-speech changes that critics warn could criminalize quoting the Bible and other religious texts.

JD Vance: Criticizing Israel Is Not Antisemitism

Vice President JD Vance said opposing Israeli policies is not the same as antisemitism, sparking debate over where criticism of Israel ends and hatred of Jews begins.

First Orthodox Prayer Book Published in Indonesian Language

The first Orthodox prayer book in Indonesian has been published and presented in Bekasi, providing local faithful and new converts with a vital resource for prayer and liturgical life.

OCA Joins Legal Challenge to Illinois Abortion Referral Law

Amicus brief argues mandate violates religious freedom and compels pro-life providers to contradict their faith.