Watchdogs require explanations from Ministry of Culture due to pressure on the UOC
According to the organisation's representatives, giving such evaluaitons by the Ministry is akin to hate mongering. Human rights defenders explained that under the legislation the Ministry of Culture has no right «to give its assessment for the actions of physical persons, including the definition of such actions as «anti-Ukrainian», given that the law does not prohibit «maintaining of business, diplomatic, and economic relations with representatives of a foreign state – the Russian Federation, as well as with citizens who are a part of «DNR» and «LNR» formations, except for the cases when such actions make up body of the crime.»
According to human rights activists, «condemnation, defamation, discrimination or public accusation of persons – representatives of the religious confession for their commitment of actions not prohibited by the law and thus lawful – are unacceptable.»
Owing to this «Public Advocacy» requested the Ministry of Culture to clarify if the agency has the information on the commencement of criminal proceedings against Metropolitan of Simferopol and Crimea Lazar, Metropolitan of Lugansk and Alchevsk Mitrofan, Metropolitan Platon and priest Alexander Yakushechkin, and what were the grounds to qualify the priests' actions as «anti-Ukrainian» or having a «separatist» character. Besides, the Ministry has to answer what restrictions are foreseen by the Ukrainian legislation with regard to carrying our religious ceremonies on the territories of the Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk regions.
On 31 January 2017 the Ministry of Culture published a “Statement as per the separatist and anti-Ukrainian rhetoric and actions of particular clergymen of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church”, in which the agency accused the UOC clergymen of carrying out religious actions of a worship character upon an order of the RF military and persons who form a part of the «LNR», as well as utterances bearing an anti-Ukrainain character, in the Ministry's opinion.
A number of experts gave a highly negative evaluation of the above statement and called it intimidation of the UOC.
Read also
ROCOR Priest Reflects on Trip to Capitol Hill
Archpriest Victor Boldewskul participated in the Society of St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco's Day of Action to raise awareness about the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Hundreds of Chinese Christians Arrested in Pre-Christmas Crackdown
Hundreds of Chinese Christians face spending Christmas in detention after authorities launched a sweeping pre-holiday crackdown on churches under Beijing’s campaign to control religious life.
Ukraine Adviser: UOC Not Banned, but Offered a 'Choice' of Jurisdictions
A Ukrainian presidential adviser said the UOC is not banned but pressured to choose between joining the OCU, submitting to Constantinople, or remaining unregistered, while dismissing international concerns as propaganda.
Indiana Reports 98% Drop in Abortions Under Stricter Law
Indiana’s latest health report shows a 98% drop in reported abortions under stricter laws, though dozens still occurred under legal exceptions and concerns persist about unreported pill abortions.
Armenian Apostolic Church Pushes Back on Political Encroachment
The Armenian Apostolic Church plans to appeal to international bodies to resist government interference and defend its clergy and sacred relics.
Attempted Takeover at Armenian Etchmiadzin Cathedral Thwarted by Faithful
Supporters of Armenian PM Pashinyan attempted to storm Etchmiadzin Cathedral amid calls for the Catholicos’s resignation but were blocked by parishioners and security.