Pat. Bartholomew: "There was no schism between Rome and Constantinople in 1054"

Istanbul—During a meeting with Greek Catholic Melkite Patriarch Gregory III on March 12, 2025, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople discussed a theory suggesting that there was no formal schism between Rome and Constantinople in 1054, reports Catholic News Agency.

According to Bartholomew, rather than a formal break, “there were tensions that intensified over time.” However, as Bartholomew emphasized, these tensions “are not insurmountable.”

Gregory III arrived in Istanbul with a group of pilgrims participating in a pilgrimage organized by the German Society of the Holy Land. The occasion for the pilgrimage was the 1700th anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea, held in 325 AD.

"Of course, many problems have accumulated over the past thousand years. But we are full of hope that they will be resolved in the coming years," the Patriarch underscored. "Everything is in God's hands. He has already prepared the true future for our Churches."

As a reminder, Patriarch Bartholomew previously stated that he would seek a common celebration of Easter with Catholics and Anglicans.

One thing is certain: Nicea will be interesting this year.

Is Lying a Sin?

Why was the Ninth Commandment not expressed directly, Thou shall not lie ? Because a lie is not something that comes out of the mouth. It’s what comes out of the heart.

The Kyiv Post Proves Our Point

How media narratives about UOJ-USA and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church collapse under their own citations

Christian Zionism Is a Heresy

Last week, the Patriarchs and Heads of the Churches in Jerusalem condemned Christian Zionism. This is long overdue. Christian Zionism is a dangerous and heretical ideology. It distorts the clear teaching of Scripture and the Fathers: that the Church, not the Zionist state, is the true Israel of God. Worse yet, it leads Christians in the West to ignore—or even cheer on—the eradication of indigenous Christian communities in the Holy Land.

Vatican I Debunks Itself: A Response to Erick Ybarra

While converting from Catholicism to Orthodoxy, I realized the strongest argument against papal infallibility isn’t buried in obscure patristic quotes. It’s screaming from the plain text of Vatican I itself: the papacy it promises simply doesn’t exist.

Sorin vs. Yasi: The Curse of Infallibility

Papal infallibility, intended as a gift to clarify doctrine, has instead become "Schrödinger's Pope"—a source of profound confusion because Catholics cannot agree on when or how often it has been exercised, rendering it practically useless for defining the boundaries of faith and causing more doctrinal chaos than it resolves.

Smoke, Mirrors, and Bad Faith: A Response to John Jackson’s “Analysis”

A detailed rebuttal of false claims, selective evidence, and activist framing presented as journalism