Legal Department: AUCCRO’s “full support” for ban on UOC is a manipulation

Members of the AUCCRO. Photo: vrciro.org.ua

The Legal Department of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church refuted the statements of Ruslan Stefanchuk, the head of the Verkhovna Rada, and Vyacheslav Horpynchuk, the chairman of the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations, that the latter unanimously supported bill No. 8371 aimed at banning the UOC.

The commentary of the Legal Department notes that during the meeting with Stefanchuk on April 11, 2023, only 6 out of 16 members of the AUCCRO spoke about the government bill, and only two structures – the OCU and the UGCC – supported it. At the same time, the representative of the UOC, Archbishop Victor of Khmelnytsky and Starokostiantyniv, not only spoke out against bill No. 8371, but also criticized other anti-church initiatives registered in parliament.

During the meeting, the participants of the AUCCRO supported the list of principles on which state-confessional relations should be based and agreed to discuss them at the next meeting "to form a position on draft law No. 8371." However, the very next day, the speaker of the parliament published a letter signed by the chairman of the AUCCRO, whereby the members of the Council allegedly supported the adoption of bill No. 8371 unanimously. News with similar statements appeared on the AUCCRO website. At the same time, the letter contained a request to take into account the provision of bill No. 8262 (on a simplified seizure of temples) when preparing bill No. 8371 for the second reading.

“Thus, in this case, manipulation occurs: the support of the UOC representatives of the principles of state-confessional relations with an agreement on further discussion at a meeting of the AUCCRO is passed off as support for government bill No. 8371 and other bills,” the UOC Legal Department underscored.

In addition, it is noted that the letter was not agreed with the UOC, although all AUCCRO decisions must be taken by consensus.

“It seems that the leadership of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine initiated this meeting in order to present its results in such a way as to cover up or justify before the world community those illegal actions that are being committed today against the UOC. The VR also seems to use the authority of the AUCCRO in order to furnish the public with information to the effect that Ukrainian religious leaders ostensibly support the bill, which is designed to ban the activities of the biggest religious organizations in Ukraine,” the lawyers of the UOC noted.

The Legal Department also emphasized that “all those illegal actions that are being committed today against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church by various activists, proponents of certain political parties with the support of government officials, do not yield any benefit for the objective interests of the state, but instead play exclusively into the hands of the Russian Federation propaganda.”

As the UOJ reported, MP from the Holos party Natalia Pipa called on the Verkhovna Rada to outlaw the Ukrainian Orthodox Church before Easter.

Read also

Church of Cyprus Defrocks Priest Amid Mounting Ecclesiastical Tensions

Fr. Dimos Serkelidis removed from clerical office following Synodal Court decision; controversy grows over internal Church governance

OCU Holds Service in Seized Cherkasy Church—But Nobody Came

Photos reveal nearly deserted worship in St. Andrew’s Church after its seizure from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC)

Romanian Orthodox Hierarchs Propose Five Women for Canonization

Canonization effort highlights upcoming Commemorative Year of Holy Women in 2026.

St. Olga of Alaska Officially Glorified in Her Hometown of Kwethluk

First North American female saint honored in historic vigil attended by hundreds of pilgrims and hierarchs.

Pro-Constantinople Outlet Reports on Violent Cathedral Seizure in Chernivtsi

An article from the Orthodox Times highlights rising attacks against UOC faithful and clergy amid escalating church property disputes.

Metropolitan Longin Alleges Assassination Plot Against Him

Bancheny hierarch claims a group from Ivano-Frankivsk was sent to kill him.