Was St. Isaac of Syria a Nestorian?

Few saints have plumbed the depths of ascetic wisdom like Isaac the Syrian, also known as Isaac of Nineveh. This 7th century bishop and hermit hailed from the region of Qatar, where he entered monastic life as a young man. His brief tenure as bishop of Nineveh—lasting only five months, before he retreated to the solitude of the mountains—marked a life dedicated to contemplation, prayer, and the pursuit of divine union. 

Within the Orthodox Church, he is commemorated on January 28 (alongside St. Ephraim the Syrian) as a pillar of hesychasm. His writings, translated into Greek by the eighth century and widely circulated in Byzantine monasteries, continue to inspire believers seeking the quietude of God’s presence. For centuries, his Ascetical Homilies have been a Lenten staple in refractories around the world. 

Yet, like many saints whose lives span turbulent historical epochs, St. Isaac has been the subject of much scholarly debate. The controversy centers on his supposed affiliation with the Church of the East, also known as the Nestorian Church, which separated from the Orthodox Catholic Church following the Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431. 

The Church of the East existed mainly within the Persian Empire, far from the Byzantine heartlands. Saint Isaac was born, ordained, and served in this milieu, leading some modern academics to question whether his ecclesial context aligns with Chalcedonian Orthodoxy. It’s a fair question, and one that—thank God—the Orthodox tradition can answer clearly.

It should be noted that, in Orthodoxy, we do not have a legalistic understanding of schism. It’s not as if, at the very moment the Council of Ephesus closed, the entire Persian Church was immediately deprived of all grace. It should also be noted that Nestorius was a talented sophist, frequently resorting to sophistry in order to present himself as orthodox.

Moreover, the Church of the East in St. Isaac’s time was not a monolithic entity rigidly adhering to heresy. The Sassanids promoted Nestorianism specifically to curb the influence of the Roman Empire. So, the heresy of Nestorius did not spread organically throughout Persia. The rejection of Chalcedon and its orthodox Christology was largely an elite affair. In those early centuries, most “Nestorians” probably were not even aware of the theological controversy. That is why Orthodox authorities have suggested that St. Isaac’s formal ties to this church do not preclude his personal fidelity to Orthodox doctrine—a position that independent scholarship would certainly bear out. 

Simply put: it would be wrong to assume that every Christian in Persia circa A.D. 600 was a committed Nestorian.

Indeed, St. Isaac’s works are entirely free of heterodox elements. This is why they were embraced by Byzantine monks who recognized their depth and power. By the ninth century, his homilies were a staple of Orthodox liturgical and ascetical life. This was no accident—no oversight on the Church’s part. Rather, it’s a testament to her incredible discernment, which is always guided by the Holy Spirit.

Again, St. Isaac’s writings reveal no trace of the Christological disputes that divided churches one way or the other! Instead, they echo the pure, experiential theology of earlier Fathers like St. Macarius the Great and Saint John Climacus. He speaks eloquently of God’s boundless mercy, the transformative power of repentance, and the inner stillness that leads to theosis. 

“Do not hate the sinner,” St. Isaac wrote, “for we are all laden with guilt. If for the sake of God you are moved to oppose him, weep over him. Why do you hate him? Hate his sins and pray for him, that you may imitate Christ Who was not wroth with sinners, but interceded for them.” Such teachings resonate deeply with Orthodox soteriology, emphasizing mercy over retribution and the healing of the soul through grace.

In this light, the controversy serves not to divide but to deepen our appreciation for the mystery of God’s love. Orthodox faithful are invited to read St. Isaac’s words with open hearts, discovering in them the same hesychasm that runs from the deserts of Egypt to the Holy Mountain of Athos. His emphasis on inner prayer—”the prayer of the heart”—aligns seamlessly with the Philokalia, the great treasury of Orthodox spirituality. Far from being a peripheral figure, he stands at the core of our tradition, reminding us that Orthodoxy is lived in the soul’s communion with Christ.

As an added supernatural assurance of St. Isaac’s orthodoxy, consider the revelation given to St. Paisios of Mount Athos. In the account preserved on the Orthodox Ethos website titled “Abba Isaac the Much-Wronged Saint,” St. Paisios grappled with doubts raised by a theologian about St. Isaac’s ecclesial context. Deeply pained, the elder prayed fervently. 

God responded by granting St. Paisios a vision: hierarchs passed before him, and among them appeared St. Isaac himself. Turning to Paisios, Isaac declared: “Yes, I lived in a Nestorian atmosphere. There were heretics in my province. But I was orthodox, and I opposed them.” St. Paisios later proclaimed emphatically: “Abba Isaac was an Orthodox Christian to the core!” He attributed Western slanders to discomfort with St. Isaac’s hesychastic depth, referring to him tenderly as “the wronged Saint.” 

This revelation, born of holy pain and divine mercy, confirms what the Church has long intuited: St. Isaac belongs fully to the Orthodox fold.

In embracing St. Isaac, we affirm the boundless grace of God, who draws saints from every corner of His earth to illumine His Church. May his prayers guide us toward that same merciful love!

Read also