Rivne Region is Aflame, or as Filaret Opens Second Front
Rivne region has become the epicenter of religious strives recently. Interfaith conflict escalated immediately after the Revolution of Dignity on the national resurgence wave. The self-proclaimed Patriarch Filaret used this fertile ground to once again set up two denominations to the confrontation and thus encourage the public to the idea of the formation of the so-called United Local Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which he wouldn’t mind to head. In addition, the unification of all Orthodox Churches would finally solve the main problem of the Kiev Patriarchate - its canonicity and recognition.
Analyzing the "hot spots" of interfaith confrontation in Rivne region and methods of their "ignition", you can confidently state that Filaret has almost succeeded in opening a second front on religious grounds. There are hardly any talks about unification or voluntary transition under the dissenters’ jurisdiction carried on in the villages, where interfaith conflicts arise. Moreover, the faithful of the UOC actively stand up for their rights in court.
For example, a religious community of the UOC in Ptycha village, Dubno district, Rivne region, has been appealing their right to the church in court. And while litigation continues, the Orthodox Christians humbly pray in the premises adopted for this purpose, waiting for a regulation that will either confirm their right to the religious building or vice versa recognize the ownership of the UOC - "KP".
Meanwhile, adherents of Filaret regularly violate different agreements and laws, arbitrarily cut off the locks on the church gate and picket Rivne regional state administration with the demand to pass the church to them. KP followers resort to practices that are not characteristic of Christians: abuse, threats and mob law. The long-lasting confrontation in the village resulted in split up families, broken friendships and hostilities among fellow villages: Ptycha is at war.
Now let’s try to disengage from the situation and envision that due to Filaret such conflicts could ignite almost in every Ukrainian village (on the official site of the UOC - "KP" almost every day new schemes of church raiding are displayed). Who will defuse them?
As a priest, I would like to call all believers, without exception, to behave like the Bible teaches us: "Love your neighbor as yourself" (Mk.12: 31). Hatred, contempt and aggression have not saved anyone, and if these methods even led to the ultimate goal, they gave a long aftertaste of bitterness, pain and sufferings.
Archpriest Viktor Zemlianyi,
Senior priest of the Holy Resurrection Church of Ostroh, Rivne Eparchy
Read also
Is Lying a Sin?
Why was the Ninth Commandment not expressed directly, Thou shall not lie ? Because a lie is not something that comes out of the mouth. It’s what comes out of the heart.
The Kyiv Post Proves Our Point
How media narratives about UOJ-USA and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church collapse under their own citations
Christian Zionism Is a Heresy
Last week, the Patriarchs and Heads of the Churches in Jerusalem condemned Christian Zionism. This is long overdue. Christian Zionism is a dangerous and heretical ideology. It distorts the clear teaching of Scripture and the Fathers: that the Church, not the Zionist state, is the true Israel of God. Worse yet, it leads Christians in the West to ignore—or even cheer on—the eradication of indigenous Christian communities in the Holy Land.
Vatican I Debunks Itself: A Response to Erick Ybarra
While converting from Catholicism to Orthodoxy, I realized the strongest argument against papal infallibility isn’t buried in obscure patristic quotes. It’s screaming from the plain text of Vatican I itself: the papacy it promises simply doesn’t exist.
Sorin vs. Yasi: The Curse of Infallibility
Papal infallibility, intended as a gift to clarify doctrine, has instead become "Schrödinger's Pope"—a source of profound confusion because Catholics cannot agree on when or how often it has been exercised, rendering it practically useless for defining the boundaries of faith and causing more doctrinal chaos than it resolves.
Smoke, Mirrors, and Bad Faith: A Response to John Jackson’s “Analysis”
A detailed rebuttal of false claims, selective evidence, and activist framing presented as journalism