Adults Pose as 13-Year-Old Girls to Order Abortion Pills Online

Photo: lifenews.com

A pro-life medical group says an undercover review found online abortion pill providers may approve high-risk orders without basic identity, pregnancy, or medical verification.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A pro-life medical organization has released an investigation claiming that online abortion pill providers can approve orders without verifying a patient’s identity, confirming pregnancy details, or requiring direct medical oversight.

The review, conducted by Dr. Christina Francis, CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), examined the online abortion pill provider AidAccess through the Plan C website. Francis said she completed the intake process while posing as a 13-year-old girl with several medical conditions that could increase the risks associated with abortion drugs, including use of blood thinners, an intrauterine device, three previous cesarean sections, and a history of ectopic pregnancy.

According to the June 2026 report, the investigator was able to proceed through the process without submitting government identification, proof of pregnancy, or an ultrasound to confirm gestational age or rule out ectopic pregnancy. The report also stated that no direct communication with a medical professional occurred before payment approval.

“Within like two minutes of submitting the form I got an email all I had to do was confirm and pay my $150,” Francis said in the report, adding that the process did not indicate that the information had been reviewed by a medical provider.

The report further alleged that users could change answers on intake forms, potentially allowing them to bypass questions about health risks. It also raised concerns about whether the system could detect possible abuse or coercion involving minors.

AAPLOG said the findings demonstrate what it considers significant safety concerns following changes that removed in-person dispensing requirements for mifepristone. The organization argued that online distribution systems lack safeguards necessary for informed consent and continuity of medical care.

Previously, the UOJ reported that a Tennessee bill sought stronger penalties for abortion-pill violations.

Share

Read also